Deployment & Operations Committee


Patrick Faraj​, Chair of the Deployment & Operations Committee of the FTTH Council Europe, takes stock of the latest evolutions in FTTH deployment technologies, and looks at the most pressing operational challenges the industry is facing nowadays. While reviewing the latest technology trends shaping the FTTH rollout scenario in Europe, Patrick provides a series of thought-provoking inputs useful to all actors in place. In this episode, our guest will answer to these questions and much more:

  1. Let’s start general: what are your views regarding the evolution of FTTH technology? 

  2. From your experience, what innovations or new technologies have been most effective in overcoming deployment challenges?  

  3. What is the profile of the Member companies joining the Deployment & Operations Committee?

  4. What are the key differences in deploying fibre networks in urban versus rural areas and how does your approach vary between these environments?

Read the full interview below to get the answers to these questions.

 

Let’s start general: what are your views regarding the evolution of FTTH technology?

Optical fibre connectivity is becoming the backbone of every high-bandwidth application, supporting everything from streaming high-definition video to online gaming and telemedicine. If we talk about FTTH specifically, it was initially seen as a nice to have, however, the need for FTTH became particularly evident in end-user applications that require consistent, high-speed connectivity. As we recently experienced, amongst other applications, remote work and online education demand reliable high speed and most importantly stable internet connections to support video conferencing and large data transfers.

Driven by the continuous evolution of end-user applications requiring more advanced high-bandwidth connectivity, FTTH technologies have also evolved to support and enable that. Advanced FTTH technologies like XG-PON, XGS-PON, and NG-PON2 helped improve network efficiency and enable network throughput of up to 40 GB/s, while coexisting with current PON standards, thus providing a future proof highly scalable solution for network expansions both in terms of bandwidth and number of users.

As we move forward, I believe the FTTH infrastructure will become a key enabler in achieving converged networks for example 5G integration, enabling deployments in a cost-effective way as described in one of the D&O committee’s whitepapers: “Optimizing FTTH networks to enable convergence”.

In the picture on the left, action from the "FTTH Technologies for the Balkans" panel session at the FTTH Congress 2024, in Dubrovnik.

From your experience, what innovations or new technologies have been most effective in overcoming deployment challenges?

I always like to address FTTH deployments by navigating across the network deployment lifecycle: Plan, Design, Build, Operate, and Maintain. Removing the challenges that come with manual processes and implementing process and workflow automation across those phases is key to optimizing and accelerating network deployments. To name one example, the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for planning and managing deployments allows for more precise and efficient network designs. If you want more insights about this topic have a look at the D&O committee whitepaper published last year that specifically addresses this area: “The role of IT in accelerating FTTH Deployments and Operations”.

Moreover, continuous innovations in areas like deployment techniques and passive components connectivity continue to play a huge role in accelerating and simplifying FTTH deployments. What I particularly find impactful are those innovations that revolve around reducing the dependency on highly skilled labor, enabling failure-free and first-time right faster installation practices. Micro-trenching, direct buried compact cables/fiber bundles, and pre-connectorized hardened solutions are a few field-proven examples. Last but not least, innovative ideas around network sharing on different layers to create an Open Access business model would help reduce deployment overbuild and offer a strategic approach to optimize resources, reduce costs and environmental impacts, and accelerate network rollout.

 

What is the profile of the Member companies joining the Deployment & Operations Committee?

I want to describe the majority of the members of the FTTH Council Europe: I would say it typically comprises a diverse range of member companies, including telecommunications operators, service providers, network equipment/ passive components manufacturers, solution providers, etc. If we focus on the Deployment & Operations committee itself, the most active members are from the solution providers group who continuously thrive to address technological advancements and innovations to overcome common challenges in FTTH rollouts. I want to use this opportunity to encourage operators and service providers to use the Deployment & Operations platform to share their knowledge and experience and present their best practices in the deployment and operation of fiber networks.

In the picture on the left, action from the Deployment & Operations Committee workshop at the FTTH Conference 2024, in Berlin.

 

 

What are the key differences in deploying fibre networks in urban versus rural areas and how does your approach vary between these environments?

The FTTH Council Europe's mission and goal is to accelerate FTTH deployments and enable every European citizen to have access to high-speed broadband connectivity, basically full fiber to everyone, everywhere. In order to get to this goal, FTTH deployments needs to expand far beyond urban and suburban areas and efficiently reach rural and ultra rural areas.

Deploying fibre networks in urban areas typically differs compared to rural areas in terms of challenges to overcome, solutions utilized, and business case justification. In urban environments, the primary challenges consist of building a network in a dense infrastructure, obtaining permits, and minimizing disruptions to existing services. The higher population density in urban areas leads to a higher take rate, meaning more subscribers per km of fiber, which reduces the costs of deployment per home passed (HP) and home connected (HC).

In contrast, rural deployments face challenges such as longer distances between connections, lower population density, and difficult terrain which means that fiber deployment reaches far fewer subscribers per km, making it less economically viable.

In the picture on the right, Patrick Faraj is moderating the "FTTH Technologies for the Balkans" panel session at the FTTH Congress 2024, in Dubrovnik.

 

More about Patrick Faraj

Patrick Faraj is currently VIAVI’s Global Product Manager managing an end-to-end SW and HW Centralized OTDR Test Solution that is designed to optimize the qualification and certification of FTTx networks across all phases of the deployment lifecycle. Patrick is a proven subject matter expert in solutions/products development, value propositions creation, and deployment practices in global FTTx networks and markets, with more than 16 years extensive product management experience including 13 years of Global Product Management in FTTX passive solutions at Corning,  Prior to his industry engagement, Patrick worked for 5 years as a research and teaching assistant at the university of Kiel, Germany, at the Chair of Telecommunications with focus on fibre optic transmission research topics. Patrick holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering and a Master of Science in Telecommunications from Riga Technical University in Latvia.

 

 

Use of recycled plastics in CPEs (Customer-premises equipment)

Member company: Genexis
Country or geographical scope: Global
Period: 2018 onwards
Company type: Vendor/Reseller
Product/service category involved: CPEs

Abstract

CPE equipment vendors can limit or even abandon the use of virgin plastics in the housing of their CPE products, by using recycled plastics instead. This has a positive impact on the circular economy, where materials can be reused. Recycled plastics material is easier and more cost-efficient to obtain in darker colors, so in practice using recycled plastics often means the products will have a black color.


Context

Policies and agreements like The Paris Agreement are driving the adoption of more sustainable products and processes. From multiple angles there is more pressure and need to reduce our environmental footprint and therewith limit global warming. This also applies to the FTTH market. The whole value chain, ranging from end-users to operators/ISPs and suppliers, is demanding for more sustainable products and solutions.

There are many aspects of sustainability, but maybe the most well-known one is recycling. With recycling, waste materials are converted into new materials. Meaning there is no need of virgin materials, while the waste materials get a new life. Recycling is nowadays widely applied for plastic packaging, but still less in products. This is a missed opportunity since this is also a feasible solution for plastic products housings of CPE equipment.
 

Solutions

Today, most plastics suppliers provide solutions for using recycled plastics in product housings for CPE equipment. The recycled plastics can offer the same specifications compared to virgin materials, while the cost difference is relatively small. This cost difference depends however on the color of recycled plastics: to obtain a white/light color, lighter color types of plastics need to be filtered out from waste streams, which is a labor-intensive task and therefore more expensive. In addition, it is more difficult to achieve a fully smooth white product surface. Hence, in practice we see that most of the recycled plastics in CPE products are black. This keeps the cost impact under control, while simplifying the recycling process and ensuring an evenly colored product surface.
 

Results

By implementing recycled plastics in its CPE portfolio, Genexis achieved multiple results. One example is a custom-made product for KPN, the Tier-1 network operator in the Netherlands. One of KPN’s goals is to use almost 100% reusable materials by 2025. To support KPN in this goal, Genexis developed a Network Terminator (NT) which uses >98% recycled plastics for the products housing.

According to the results of a professional Product Circularity Report, besides the recycled housing a total of 56% of the materials used in the NT can, in theory, be recycled. Furthermore, the NT is well designed for disassembly and almost all connections are accessible. This results in high levels of component recovery. For all details, please refer to the Product Circularity Report that can be found here.
 

Conclusions

Recycling is very common for plastic packaging, but unfortunately less common for CPEs so far. This is a missed opportunity, since recycled plastic materials are widely available with similar specifications and at similar pricing levels compared to virgin plastics. Achieving white recycled plastics out of a wide color range of waste streams is a challenge however, therefore we see a trend of an increasing number of black CPEs in the market. The question is whether operators, ISPs and end-users will accept this, but hopefully this will not be a blocking factor in making CPEs more sustainable.
 

Contact

Martijn Rooijakkers, Sr. Commercial Product Manager, Genexis
m.rooijakkers@genexis.eu

 

 

Help us create a brighter future!

Join the Fibre Council Europe
today and benefit from Europe’s
largest ecosystem of fibre players